Feedback K2004

Questions marked by * must be answered before you can send the form.

* Student id (with the letter)

* Department


* Year of study (the number of years you have enrolled as a present sudent)


* I was hearing lectures


12. * My opinion from the lectures ("I completely disagree 1" - "I completely agree 4")

topic 1 2 3 4 (no comments)
Lecturer presented topics understandable          
Lectures made me to think lecture topics          
Lecturer pointed out what topics were essential          
Speed of the lectures was too slow          
Speed of the lectures was too fast          

Additional comments about the lectures

* I Read the course newsgroup

never   rarely   every now and then   often  

* I Wrote to the course newsgroup

never   once   more than once  

* I Participated the exercise groups in Maari approximately

never   once or twice   no more than 10 times   once a week   more than that  

* I got enough time from the assistant or assistants of the group ("I completely disagree 1" - "I completely agree 4")

topic 1 2 3 4 (no comments)
Mo 12-14 (Maari-C)          
Tu 16-20 (Maari-C)          
We 10-12 (Maari-A)          
We 12-14 (Maari-M, english group)          
Fr 08-10 (Maari-C)          

* The assistant in the exercise group was competent ("I completely disagree 1" - "I completely agree 4")

topic 1 2 3 4 (no comment)
I don't remember the name of the assistant but i want to comment          
Ilmari Aalto (Mo 12-14, We 10-12)          
Timo Laitinen (Tu 16-20, We 10-12 12-14 (eng))          
Timo Perälä (Fr 8-10 last weeks)          
Timo Ratilainen (We 10-12, only few weeks)          
Petri Tenhunen (Fr 8-10 on the firsth half of the course)          

* The assistant in the exercise group was a good teacher ("I completely disagree 1" - "I completely agree 4")

topic 1 2 3 4 (no comment)
I don't remember the name of the assistant but i want to comment          
Ilmari Aalto (Mo 12-14, We 10-12)          
Timo Laitinen (Tu 16-20, We 10-12 12-14 (eng))          
Timo Perälä (Fr 8-10 last weeks)          
Timo Ratilainen (We 10-12, only few weeks)          
Petri Tenhunen (Fr 8-10 in the firsth half of the course)          

Additional comments about the assistants

* Workload compared to credits


If the number of credits is not correct, what would be the correct amount of credits compared to the workload of this course? You can also explain your opinion informally.

* Difficulty of the course


* Evaluate the following topics on scale Very Poor 1- Very good 4. If the course requirements don't include examination, assignements etc., choose the option 'Not participated'.

topic 1 2 3 4 Not participated
lectures          
exercise sessions in Maari          
assignments          
material          
arrangements          
course information          
exam          
usefullness of the course          
overall grade for the course          

8. * Evaluate the following topics on scale "I completely disagree 1" - "I completely agree 4".

topic 1 2 3 4
course material formed a clear thematic entity        
there was much substantial overlap with the other parts (major/minor or other modules) of my studies        
goals of the course were clear to me        
criteria for the course grading were informed well        
requirements of the course were corresponding with the teaching and the material        

Here you can comment lectures, assignements, arrangements, exam etc. What worked out well?

What did not work out well, how would you develop these things?

Here you can comment the course as a whole.

The next three questions are about typing skills; that is, typing using ten fingers. These questions are not related to the teaching of the course but the data is collected for on-going research. Research is carried out by Sami Surakka

* Have you taken any course on type writing?


* Can you type by using ten fingers?


* When you are typing, how often do you typically look at the keyboard during one minute if you do not have any breaks, for example thinking about the problem?